Shepard for Congress - Write-In 2008
Rep. Welch's vote for Bush bailout was wrong!
October 27, 2008
Two-term Vermont State Senator Mark Shepard from
Bennington who ran for Congress in 2006 has put his name forward as a write-in
option for Congress this year. Shepard, 48, was raised on a Hartland
Strawberry farm. Since leaving elected politics, Shepard has been
focusing his energies on his engineering business and had no intention of
running for Congress this year. However, after Representative Peter
Welch, who is essentially running unopposed, decided to support President
Bush's federal bailout, Shepard expressed the need for Vermonters to have
another option. In a recent letter to the editor, Shepard advocated that
"even if Rep. Welch was the only name on the ballet, Vermonters should not
bail him out with a vote on Nov. 4."
Peter Welch's vote for the $850 billion bailout
was wrong for a number of reasons:
1. It is wrong to continually expect taxpayers to bailout failures. This is becoming a bad habit in America and where does it
stop?
2. On his first bailout bill Rep. Welch voted no and made a good case for why taxpayers should not be saddled with a $700 billion
bailout. Then when the amount was increased to $850 billion he
switched his vote and voted for the increased bailout. He followed
that vote up by sending out an intellectually insulting email letter
outlining his rationale for now supporting the even larger bailout.
He presented no good case for voting for the second bailout bill, most
especially after he had voted against the smaller bailout bill. At
best it was a vote out of fear - "do something even if it's
wrong." There were better ideas, and as a member of the party
in control of Congress he should be in a position to work with his
majority for real solutions.
3. Perhaps most disturbing is such a vote switch likely would not have happened if he had a real contest for reelection. It
seems clear that he followed his Washington party's leadership instead of
the voice of his constituents. Having no viable opponent, Rep. Welch
knew he could get away with this vote against taxpayers. Vermonters
were taken granted and that is wrong.
Shepard said, "My opposition to throwing
taxpayer money at problems rather than working toward real solutions and my
desire that Vermonters have a means of expressing their disappointment or even
outrage at this action by Representative Welch has compelled me to put my name
forward."
Shepard said, "Clearly time is short and
many Vermonters have already voted, but at a minimum I want to give Vermonters
a means to give Representative Welch a wakeup call and let him know we expect
more from our only member to Congress. Just write-in Mark Shepard,
Bennington and send Peter Welch a clear message that we do not appreciate
him redistributing our wages to those who failed to perform their duties on
Wall Street and Washington."
While there are other options on the ballot,
none are known well throughout the state and none are running a serious
campaign, hence most Vermonters will not consider voting for any of
these. Shepard hopes that his having served in the Vermont Senate and his
run for Congress in 2006 will help provide a viable place for Vermonters to
send a clear message to Peter Welch, President Bush and Washington DC that we
taxpayers cannot continually bailout irresponsibility. Not only is it
wrong, it is not sustainable and weakens our nation.
Many Vermonters are showing support for Shepard
by putting up their 2006 campaign signs and spreading the word that there is an
option to Welch. Vermonters can learn more about Mark Shepard at his 2006
website, www.shepardforcongress.org.
Please
feel free to contact Mark Shepard at 249-7886 or by email at mark@markshepard.us. You may also
contact Bill Stafford of Colchester, who managed Shepard's campaign in 2006 at 862-0858
or billstafford1@verizon.net.
Excerpts from
articles during Mark's 2006 run for Congress
View related articles from 2006 Campaign
|